Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating
Best Lawyers
The Best Lawyers in America
Avvo Clients' Choice
Avvo Rating 10.0
National College for DUI Defense
National Collage for DUI Defense
American Council Of Second Amendment Lawyers

People vs. A. D.

Court: 41A District Court – Shelby Twp.
Charge: Careless driving

While traveling west on Hall road, the deputy observed our client's vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed. The vehicle changed lanes, then accelerated to about 70 mph, and applied its brakes quickly to avoid hitting the vehicle ahead. Our client's vehicle then stopped for a red light, and when the light turned green, sat below the light without moving. The vehicle turned on its turn signal and pulled into the Amoco gas station.

Upon contact with the driver, the arresting officer noted an odor of intoxicants "which grew stronger as she spoke". Her eyes were red and bloodshot. She admitted drinking one drink. Her speech was slurred. When asked to perform field exercises, the driver responded "my father is an attorney and he advised me to never take any tests if stopped for drinking and driving". The driver refused to take the roadside breath test, and also refused the evidentiary test back at the jail. The deputy did obtain a warrant for a blood draw, and our client was taken to a local hospital so that the blood could be tested. The blood was sent to the State Lab for testing, and the results were over the legal limit.

We filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the arrest was invalid and improper, and also arguing that the prosecutor would be unable to lay an appropriate foundation for admission of the blood test results. On the date of the evidentiary hearing, the prosecutor offered to allow a plea of guilty to the lesser included charge of operation while visibly impaired, which would be taken under advisement, and further agreed that if there were no further violations during the period of the six month advisement period, then the charge would be further reduced to a careless driving, a three point civil infraction. She received a small fine. Her driver license was not suspended, revoked or in any way restricted, (she retained full driving privileges). Additionally, there was no jail time, no probation and no community service.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Patrick Barone is the ONLY choice for DUI defense. He was realistic from the start and made it a point to look at my case before taking my money. As a business owner, when I think of attorneys, I think of the "shark infested waters. Patrick is a shark alright, but his prey is not the client; it's justice for his client. Ten stars Patrick!! Chris F.
★★★★★
Attorney Patrick Barone was very helpful and helped me understand the charge and sentence absolutely clearly. He also guided me through step by step helping me form a statement. His instructions were clear and detailed. It was obvious he cared about me understanding every important detail within my case. I would absolutely recommend this defense firm to anyone in need. Aaron B.
★★★★★
The Barone Defense Firm is the firm I recommend. They are truly concerned about the person, not just the legal issue, but the person as well. They are the most knowledgeable defense firm that I am aware of, having actually written the book on DWI Defense. If you are faced with a DWI you will not find a more professional and skilled law firm. But, most importantly, they care about how the accused individual recovers his or her life when the case is complete. Very remarkable group of lawyers. William H.