Short Answer: A substance use evaluation is a clinical assessment conducted by a qualified professional to determine whether a person has an alcohol or drug use disorder and whether treatment would be beneficial. In a Michigan DUI case, an independent evaluation may also help with plea negotiations and sentencing. Obtaining the evaluation early gives the client time to begin any recommended treatment and establish a record of progress before the case reaches sentencing.

Being arrested for drunk driving does not necessarily mean that someone has an alcohol use disorder. An arrest may raise legitimate questions about a person’s relationship with alcohol, but answering those questions requires more than a review of the police report, chemical test results and prior record. A qualified evaluator considers the person’s drinking history, health, personal circumstances, and other clinical information before reaching a conclusion.

At the Barone Defense Firm, we frequently recommend a private substance use evaluation early in the representation. The evaluation can help us understand whether treatment would be appropriate and, when necessary, begin developing a sentencing mitigation strategy. It may also help the client recognize and address problems that extend beyond the criminal case.

For most people facing criminal charges in Michigan, their first court appearance is an arraignment, a proceeding that places them in an unfamiliar and often intimidating world. The language and rules are foreign, and the proceedings seem governed by customs everyone understands except them.

What makes the experience particularly frightening for our clients is finding themselves there as a criminal defendant, a role is usually profoundly inconsistent with your sense of who you are. Although an arraignment may last only a few minutes, what happens can have significant consequences for the rest of your case.

A Michigan criminal arraignment serves several purposes. It provides formal notice of the criminal accusation, establishes the conditions of any applicable bond, and in the most serious felonies, also involves a decision about whether the accused will remain in custody or be released while the case proceeds. For someone charged with drunk driving, a firearm offense, a sex crime, or another Michigan criminal offense, understanding this first step can reduce uncertainty and help avoid mistakes.

A serum blood alcohol test performed by a hospital is not the same measurement as the whole-blood alcohol concentration used in a Michigan DUI prosecution. The hospital ordinarily measures alcohol in serum or plasma for clinical treatment. The prosecution then seeks to translate that medical result into an “equivalent” whole-blood BAC.That translation is not a direct measurement. It is a second scientific estimate built on top of the first measurement. Unless the prosecution can establish the reliability of the hospital assay, justify the conversion method for the individual patient, and quantify the combined uncertainty of both steps, the converted number should not be admitted as reliable proof of a particular whole-blood alcohol concentration.

Short answer: A hospital serum result may show that ethanol was detected and may have clinical value. But it does not, by itself, establish the driver’s whole-blood BAC. A prosecution number produced by applying a population conversion factor must include a scientifically defensible uncertainty range that accounts for the hospital measurement and the conversion itself.

A Serum Blood Alcohol Test Answers a Different Question

Clients often ask how long it takes for DUI charges to be filed after an arrest in Michigan. There is no single number of days that applies to every case. Some Michigan DUI cases move into court almost immediately, while others can remain in the period between arrest and formal charging for weeks or longer, particularly when the prosecutor is waiting for a blood or toxicology result.The important point is that being released without a ticket, court date, or immediate charge does not mean the case has gone away. In Michigan, the statutory term for DUI is operating while intoxicated, or OWI, and the procedure used to begin an OWI case depends on how the police and prosecutor proceed after the arrest.

What Happens After a Michigan DUI Arrest?

A fatal intoxicated-driving crash can expose a driver to one of Michigan’s most serious felony prosecutions. But the fact that alcohol or drugs were involved, even when combined with a death, does not automatically transform an OWI causing death case into second-degree murder.

Michigan hospital blood results can become evidence in a DUI case even when medical personnel drew the blood for treatment before the driver was arrested. Michigan’s statutory term is operating while intoxicated, or OWI, although most people search for this issue as DUI. The prosecutor’s ability to obtain the result depends on why the blood was drawn, what happened before the hospital transport, who requested the result, and precisely what the hospital disclosed.

Hospital blood results in a Michigan DUI case reviewed for a warrant issueThe controlling Michigan Supreme Court decision remains People v. Perlos. It upheld the statutory procedure in 1990. More recent Fourth Amendment law creates a principled basis for challenging the statute as unconstitutional as applied to the warrantless acquisition of private medical information and for asking the Michigan Supreme Court to reconsider Perlos. But no controlling decision has displaced Perlos. A careful defense must therefore develop the constitutional challenge while also testing whether the prosecution satisfied the statute in the first place.

What Is Involuntary Intoxication Under Michigan Law?


The defense is much narrower than simply having a compelling reason to drive. Fear, inconvenience, being stranded, or even a serious argument will not necessarily be enough. The threat must be sufficiently serious and immediate, the defendant must actually have feared death or serious bodily harm, and the decision to drive must have been made because of that threat.

Why Could GLP-1 Medications Matter in an Alcohol-Related DUI Case?

Short Answer

Victim intoxication can be relevant in a Michigan DUI causing death case, but not simply because alcohol, marijuana, or another drug was found in the victim’s system. The important question is whether the victim’s intoxication, considered together with the victim’s conduct and the other circumstances of the collision, tends to show gross negligence that could affect proximate causation. The Michigan Supreme Court’s 2026 decision in People v Morgan makes clear that courts should not evaluate intoxication, speed, acceleration, reaction time, and other relevant conduct in separate silos.

Victim intoxication can become an important issue in a Michigan DUI causing death prosecution when alcohol or drug evidence bears on the victim’s conduct and the causation analysis. But the legal significance of that evidence is more complicated than simply asking whether the victim was intoxicated or even by learning how intoxicated they were.

Contact Information