Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating
Best Lawyers
The Best Lawyers in America
Avvo Clients' Choice
Avvo Rating 10.0
National College for DUI Defense
National Collage for DUI Defense
American Council Of Second Amendment Lawyers

People vs. G.F.

Court: DLAD Southfield
Charge: DUI

G.F. was stopped for traveling well in excess of the posted speed limit (65 in a 40mph zone). Once the reporting officer activated his signal to stop, the driver took a long time to respond and pull over. Upon contact, the driver was unable to produce the vehicle paperwork, and "had a very difficult time trying to take his license out of his wallet". The reporting officer also noted a strong odor of "an alcoholic beverage". His eyes were watery and his speech was slurred.

The driver was asked to exit his vehicle to perform some field tasks. The reporting officer noted in his report that the driver was "too unstable" to perform the one leg stand or heel-to-toe tasks. He skipped letters when trying to recite the alphabet, and also started over once starting. Further, he slurred letters together and spoke slowly. He also was not able to perform the backward count, missing numbers and also slurring numbers together.

Mr. F refused the roadside breath test and thereafter was arrested for OWI. He also refused the breath test back at the station. The police obtained a search warrant for blood. Two vials of blood were drawn and sent to the State lab for testing.

Upon being retained, we immediately made a demand for a hearing to appeal the officer's determination that our client had violated Michigan's implied consent law. At the hearing, we listened very closely to the officer's testimony. At the end of his testimony, it was evident that the officer had not meet his burden of proof relative to the third issue, i.e., whether or not the chemical test rights had been properly read. Consequently, the hearing officer granted the appeal and dismissed the implied consent violation. As a result of this victory, our client's license was not suspended for one year, and six points were not added to his driving record.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Patrick Barone is the ONLY choice for DUI defense. He was realistic from the start and made it a point to look at my case before taking my money. As a business owner, when I think of attorneys, I think of the "shark infested waters. Patrick is a shark alright, but his prey is not the client; it's justice for his client. Ten stars Patrick!! Chris F.
★★★★★
Attorney Patrick Barone was very helpful and helped me understand the charge and sentence absolutely clearly. He also guided me through step by step helping me form a statement. His instructions were clear and detailed. It was obvious he cared about me understanding every important detail within my case. I would absolutely recommend this defense firm to anyone in need. Aaron B.
★★★★★
The Barone Defense Firm is the firm I recommend. They are truly concerned about the person, not just the legal issue, but the person as well. They are the most knowledgeable defense firm that I am aware of, having actually written the book on DWI Defense. If you are faced with a DWI you will not find a more professional and skilled law firm. But, most importantly, they care about how the accused individual recovers his or her life when the case is complete. Very remarkable group of lawyers. William H.