Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating
The Best Lawyers in America
Avvo Clients' Choice
Avvo Rating 10.0
National College for DUI Defense
National Collage for DUI Defense
American Council Of Second Amendment Lawyers
Avvo Clients Choice Award
Avvo Rating
Trial Lawyers University
Best Lawyers
James Publishing Author
Super Lawyers
Trial Lawyers College

Will I Stay out on Bond After I Plead Guilty to a Federal Crime?

As with most legal questions, there is no absolute yes or no answer to this question. If you are considering accepting a Rule 11 plea offer from the Assistant United States Attorney, then be sure to discuss this question in detail so you know what to expect at your plea hearing.

What Does the Law Require Regarding Pretrial Detention After a Guilty Plea?

When thinking about this question, the logical place to start would be looking at the applicable court rules and statutes. In the federal district court, bail determinations are regulated by the Bail Reform Act of 1984. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3156 (1990). These laws provide "judicial officers" with the rules they must apply when setting bail in all federal criminal proceedings. The term “judicial officer” is defined in 18, USC Section 3156, and includes federal district court judges and magistrates.

The Bail Reform Act applies both before and after a federal criminal conviction. However, upon conviction after a plea or trial, once a defendant has been convicted of the federal charges, 18 USC § 3143 more specifically applies. Subsection a(1) of this law says that the judicial officer presiding over the taking of the Rule 11 plea “shall order” that a person who has been found guilty be detained. Another way this is expressed is by use of the term “remanded.” More simply, this means that after a person has plead guilty to a federal crime, the magistrate or judge is required to cancel their bond and have them placed into the federal prison system while they await sentencing.

There are limited exceptions to this rule, and there are also circumstances that make remand mandatory. One exception pertains to your sentencing guidelines. If the sentencing guidelines provide that incarceration is unlikely, then a judicial officer need not cancel a person’s bail. The same is true if the AUSA recommends against incarceration. Another exception is when the judicial officer finds by “clear and convincing evidence” (a very high standard of proof), that it is likely a person will show up in the future and does not pose a danger to public safety under section 3142(b) or (c).

Is Remand Ever Mandatory?

Remand is mandatory if a person pleads guilty to certain types of federal crimes. In these cases, the judicial officer must remand a person into custody after they have plead guilty. This is because 18 USC § 3143(a)(2) says that a conviction for a crime identified in 18 USC 3142(f)(1) (A), (B), or (C) requires mandatory remand.

18 USC 3142(f)(1)(A) requires mandatory remand on crimes of violence, a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1591, which applies to child sex trafficking, or an offense listed in 18 U.S. Code § 2332b(g)(5)(B), which applies to certain kinds of terrorism.

18 USC 3142(f)(1)(B) requires mandatory remand on crimes punishable by a maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; and

18 USC 3142(f)(1)(C) requires mandatory remand on certain kinds of drug crimes punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more.

What Does “Crimes of Violence” Mean?

The answer to this question requires a bit more complicated statutory interpretation. 18 U.S.C.A. § 16 only indirectly defines a crime of violence as an offense that has as an element of physical force against a person or “any other felony” that “by its nature” involves a “substantial risk” of physical force.

However, 18 USC 3156(a)(4) does further define crimes of violence as follows:

18 USC 3156(a)(4)(A) includes offenses having an element of physical force against the person or property of another,

18 USC 3156(a)(4)(B) any other felony that “by its nature” involves a substantial risk of physical force; and

18 USC 3156(a)(4) (C) which covers any felony under chapter 77, which covers trafficking and slavery offenses, 109A which covers various kinds of sexual abuse, 110 which covers child sexual abuse, and 117 which covers the transportation of others for illegal sexual activity and related crimes.

Does Mandatory Really Mean Mandatory?

The statutory term used is “shall” and that is always considered mandatory language. However, our experience is that even with this mandatory language, not all judicial officers in both the Eastern and Western District Courts in Michigan strictly follow this law. Many of our clients charged with crimes that would trigger mandatory remand have not be placed in prison while awaiting sentence. However, because of the complexity of this issue, it is essential that you discuss this matter with your federal criminal defense lawyer before you enter your Rule 11 plea in the federal district court.

<< Back to the main Federal Criminal Law page

Call Today! FREE Consultation Lawyer and Receive Immediate Attention for Your Criminal Law Case Patrick T. Barone is a Michigan Super Lawyer, who has maintained continuous top attorney ratings since 2007. In addition, the Michigan native is the author of multiple books on OWI, DUI and criminal law. The OUIL attorney near me has lectured at over 80 legal seminars all over America. He leads Barone Defense Firm in providing aggressive legal warriors for each client's criminal case.

Contact us 24 hours a day at our law firm’s easy to remember toll-free number, 1-877-ALL-MICH or 877-255-6424, for a free criminal case review. The Michigan attorneys near me at Barone Defense Firm travel the entire Great Lakes State, to help citizens in legal trouble in Michigan for alleged criminal law violations.

For your FREE lawyer consultation, call today to learn how to protect yourself from a possible unwarranted conviction. What do you have to lose, when the free legal advice with our litigation team’s criminal lawyers near me can answer many tough questions?

Client Reviews
Patrick Barone is the ONLY choice for DUI defense. He was realistic from the start and made it a point to look at my case before taking my money. As a business owner, when I think of attorneys, I think of the "shark infested waters. Patrick is a shark alright, but his prey is not the client; it's justice for his client. Ten stars Patrick!! Chris F.
Attorney Patrick Barone was very helpful and helped me understand the charge and sentence absolutely clearly. He also guided me through step by step helping me form a statement. His instructions were clear and detailed. It was obvious he cared about me understanding every important detail within my case. I would absolutely recommend this defense firm to anyone in need. Aaron B.
The Barone Defense Firm is the firm I recommend. They are truly concerned about the person, not just the legal issue, but the person as well. They are the most knowledgeable defense firm that I am aware of, having actually written the book on DWI Defense. If you are faced with a DWI you will not find a more professional and skilled law firm. But, most importantly, they care about how the accused individual recovers his or her life when the case is complete. Very remarkable group of lawyers. William H.