Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating
Best Lawyers
The Best Lawyers in America
Avvo Clients' Choice
Avvo Rating 10.0
National College for DUI Defense
National Collage for DUI Defense
American Council Of Second Amendment Lawyers

Felony Child Sexually Abusive Material (CSAM) Case Dismissed

The following case was handled by Michigan Sex Crimes Lawyer Michael Boyle:

Our client was arrested and charged with Possession of Child Sexually Abusive Material, known as CSAM, a 4-year felony, and a tier I offense for Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA). Our client was 23-year old man who had never been in trouble. Facing 15 years in prison and SORA registration, he was terrified of the possible loss of freedom and embarrassment related to these charges, particularly as it related to his family and employer. He felt he as deeply in need of both personal and legal help.

Immediately after being retained, Mr. Boyle spent considerable time with client going through his personal history and learning as much as possible about his background. This is important because we are the client’s representative and part of our job is to help the prosecutor and court understand who are client is; to look at him as a “real” person, not defined solely by the charges he was facing. Mr. Boyle also helped him navigate the initiation of professional counseling to assist him with his own history of abuse and the stress of the legal charges.

Our legal representation included conducting our own thorough investigation, independent of the police investigation, as well as sending to the prosecutor and court detailed and exhaustive discovery demands. Discovery refers to the required sharing of information between the prosecutor and the defense attorney. As defense attorneys we are able to “discover” what the prosecutor has in his/her file, such as police reports, witness investigations, forensic details, etc. For example, in these cases the discovery nearly always includes a copy of the affidavit and warrant used to create the legal basis for the search, copies of all communications and witness tips, and forensic analysis of the computers and phones.

Many of these cases, including this one, began with a tip from a social media company for an inquiry with National Center of Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). NCMEC then sent the tip to local law enforcement who then seeks a warrant for the Communications Company and ultimately track the IP Address to identify potential user(s). Each IP Address is unique, and ultimately led to a warrant against our client.

We were able to review the forensic reports and concluded that the material alleged to support the prosecutor’s conclusion that our client uploaded the illegal material lacked sufficient support. Essentially the case fell into a circumstantial case vs factual case. We also argued that the search warrant was defective in that it also lacked verifiable facts sufficient to establish the necessary probable cause. As we continued to investigate and prepare our defense it was necessary for us to adjourn the preliminary exam. When the case was set for the second probable cause conference the prosecution agreed to a dismiss the felony CSAM charge. A new “amended” charge was added, that being Misuse of Telecommunications Device, a 180-day Misdemeanor. This is not a sex crime and does not require any registration on SORA. The work was not done yet. The client agreed to plead guilty to this new charge.

Prior to Sentencing we met with the prosecutor again to present the personal case, the story, of our client and also to related and explain the extensive counseling he’d been doing. Our client had recently renewed his faith and also had a pending baptism ceremony. His life had been significantly pushed off course from the abuse he endured from a young age. This case was arguably was a low point in his life but allowed him to begin a new chapter, a rebirth, and live a proud life. Based on our discussions, in addition to the significant reduction in the charges, the prosecutor also agreed to consent to a HYTA (Holmes Youthful Trainee Act) designation. Because he was over 21 but under 24 years of age, the HYTA did require that both the prosecutor and the judge consent. HYTA was important because this would mean that there would be no adjudication of guilt. The criminal record would be sealed, and upon successful completion of probation the case will be dismissed. Summarily it means that his record will remain clean.

The Judge agreed to HYTA at sentencing and ordered 18 months of probation. The Judge told our client that he was not defined by the abuse he had suffered and being charged with this crime did not define him, but instead, he would be defined by his future. The Judge was impressed with our client, and her final words to him were “keep it up!”

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Patrick Barone is the ONLY choice for DUI defense. He was realistic from the start and made it a point to look at my case before taking my money. As a business owner, when I think of attorneys, I think of the "shark infested waters. Patrick is a shark alright, but his prey is not the client; it's justice for his client. Ten stars Patrick!! Chris F.
★★★★★
Attorney Patrick Barone was very helpful and helped me understand the charge and sentence absolutely clearly. He also guided me through step by step helping me form a statement. His instructions were clear and detailed. It was obvious he cared about me understanding every important detail within my case. I would absolutely recommend this defense firm to anyone in need. Aaron B.
★★★★★
The Barone Defense Firm is the firm I recommend. They are truly concerned about the person, not just the legal issue, but the person as well. They are the most knowledgeable defense firm that I am aware of, having actually written the book on DWI Defense. If you are faced with a DWI you will not find a more professional and skilled law firm. But, most importantly, they care about how the accused individual recovers his or her life when the case is complete. Very remarkable group of lawyers. William H.