Search
Should I Refuse the Field Sobriety Tests in Michigan?
You have the right to refuse field sobriety tests in Michigan, and the refusal carries no license sanctions and no criminal penalties. But the decision involves tradeoffs that most people facing this choice do not fully understand. A 2016 Michigan statute changed the admissibility framework for these tests, Michigan case law has established that refusal can be used to support probable cause for your arrest, and prosecutors may argue your refusal as evidence of consciousness of guilt at trial. The right question to ask is not simply whether you can refuse. The question is whether you should, given the specific facts of your stop and the legal landscape that now surrounds that choice.
What Are Field Sobriety Tests and Why Do They Matter in a Michigan OWI Case?
Field sobriety tests are roadside assessments an officer uses to observe your physical and cognitive performance before making an arrest decision. In an alcohol-impaired driving investigation, Michigan recognizes three standardized field sobriety tests endorsed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk and turn, and the one leg stand. These are the tests an officer will administer during a typical roadside alcohol investigation and the ones at issue in the vast majority of OWI arrests.
Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog


Michigan’s implied consent law rests on a legal fiction: by accepting a Michigan driver’s license, a person is deemed to have consented in advance to a chemical test if lawfully arrested for OWI. But that fictional consent cannot operate as a legitimate exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement until it comes into actual existence. It does so only when the officer reads the prescribed chemical test rights advisement following a lawful arrest, and the driver is given a genuine opportunity to either reaffirm that consent by submitting to the test or withdraw it by refusing. Until that advisement is given, there is no actual consent, only the legal fiction of it, and a fiction alone cannot satisfy the Fourth Amendment.