DUI Enforcement

When Can a Victim’s Intoxication Matter in a Michigan DUI Causing Death Case?

Published on: September 3, 2026 | by Patrick Barone

Short Answer

Victim intoxication can be relevant in a Michigan DUI causing death case, but not simply because alcohol, marijuana, or another drug was found in the victim’s system. The important question is whether the victim’s intoxication, considered together with the victim’s conduct and the other circumstances of the collision, tends to show gross negligence that could affect proximate causation. The Michigan Supreme Court’s 2026 decision in People v Morgan makes clear that courts should not evaluate intoxication, speed, acceleration, reaction time, and other relevant conduct in separate silos.

Victim intoxication can become an important issue in a Michigan DUI causing death prosecution when alcohol or drug evidence bears on the victim’s conduct and the causation analysis. But the legal significance of that evidence is more complicated than simply asking whether the victim was intoxicated or even by learning how intoxicated they were.

Michigan OWI for Financial Professionals: License, Career, and Reputation Risks

Published on: April 29, 2026 | by Patrick Barone

Michigan OWI for financial professionals can create problems that extend far beyond court. For financial advisors, brokers, investment adviser representatives, CFP professionals, CPAs, insurance producers, bankers, executives, and other financial professionals, the criminal case is only one part of the risk. The larger concern may be disclosure, licensing, employment, client trust, background checks, travel restrictions, and long-term reputational harm.

A first-offense Michigan OWI does not automatically end a financial professional’s career, but it can create serious professional consequences. The impact depends on the exact charge, whether the case is a misdemeanor or felony, the person’s license or registration, employer policies, aggravating facts, and whether any required disclosure is made accurately and on time. The most important step is to defend the criminal case while also identifying every professional reporting obligation before a missed deadline or inconsistent statement becomes a separate problem.

Michigan OWI for financial professionals affecting licensing and career consequences For many financial professionals, the OWI charge is the first time they have ever been treated as a criminal defendant. They may be embarrassed, anxious, and afraid that one incident will redefine a lifetime of professional achievement. A good defense should address those fears directly while building a practical plan for the court case, the license issues, and the professional narrative.

Caduceus Meetings: 12-Step Support for Healthcare Professionals in Michigan

Published on: March 22, 2026 | by Patrick Barone

Caduceus meetings are confidential twelve-step support groups designed exclusively for licensed healthcare professionals in Michigan navigating recovery from alcohol or substance use disorders. Unlike general AA or NA meetings, Caduceus groups restrict membership to licensed providers, which allows members to speak openly about workplace substance access, licensing board concerns, and the professional consequences of substance use with peers who face the same challenges.

What Are Caduceus Meetings?

If you’re a healthcare professional facing an DUI charge in Michigan, you may benefit from a specialized recovery support group designed specifically for medical professionals. Caduceus meetings are confidential 12-step support groups created exclusively for licensed healthcare providers struggling with chemical addiction and substance use disorders.

Michigan OWI for Doctors: Consequences and Strategies

Published on: March 20, 2026 | by Patrick Barone

A Michigan OWI for doctors triggers two separate proceedings that move on different timelines and are evaluated by different decision-makers: the criminal case in court, and a licensing inquiry before LARA and the Board of Medicine that applies its own fitness and public safety standard regardless of how the criminal case resolves.

A conviction that appears manageable in criminal court can produce a licensing consequence that threatens the medical career, because the Board does not evaluate OWI conduct as an isolated lapse in judgment. It evaluates what the charge reflects about the physician’s fitness to practice and risk to patients.

What Legal Consequences Do Michigan Doctors Face for an OWI?

Intoxilyzer 9000 – Michigan’s New Breath Test Instrument

Published on: May 8, 2023 | by Patrick Barone

Effective immediately, the Intoxilizer 9000 is replacing the DataMaster DMT as Michigan’s new breath test instrument. If you are arrested for DUI in Michigan, the chances are good your breath will be tested on a 9000. If you were over the legal limit, then keep in mind that a top DUI lawyer can beat breath test results in court.

However, for a short period of time, both breath alcohol test instruments will be used. Consequently, depending on the date and time of your evidential breath alcohol test, the police may have used the outdated DMT. If this is true in your case, then be sure to hire a top DUI defense lawyer to represent you. Breath test results rendered by the DMT are inherently untrustworthy. See this article if you are not sure how to find a top Michigan DUI lawyer.

This change to the 9000 is primarily due to the age of the DMTs currently in service. Also, the inability to obtain parts for this older equipment, and MSPs desire to employ newer technology. The Intoxilizer 9000 is widely used across the United States and is often relied upon by law enforcement agencies to determine whether an individual is legally intoxicated.

Can You Get a DUI for Being High?

Published on: October 10, 2022 | by Patrick Barone

Many people ask us if you can get a DUI for being high. The answer is yes, you can get a DUI in Michigan for being high on Marijuana. If you use cannabis for medical or recreational purposes, you might wonder, “How do cops test for a weed DUI? Police officers will use the same kind of roadside tests used for one involving alcohol. So, from this perspective, there is little difference in a DUI with weed vs. alcohol.

What many drivers don’t realize is that you can be arrested for driving under the influence of marijuana even if you used it legally and hours earlier. Michigan law doesn’t set a legal limit for THC like it does for alcohol, so the decision to arrest often depends on the officer’s observations—things like your driving behavior, field sobriety test performance, and physical appearance. This creates a lot of legal gray areas, especially for people who use medical marijuana and may have residual THC in their system without being impaired.

Without getting to technical, one difference is that a DRE officer might be involved if the cops suspect marijuana impairment. Another difference is that there is currently no DUI breath test for weed.

Michigan Drunk Driving Case Dismissed After Anonymous 911 Call Ruled Insufficient to Support Traffic Stop

Published on: January 28, 2022 | by Patrick Barone

Michigan drivers are sometimes stopped under suspicion of intoxicated driving after a concerned citizen calls 911. The validity of these traffic stops are highly fact-specific, and depending on exactly what is reported to 911, the stop may or may not be sufficient to support a DUI conviction.

One case in Michigan where the DUI traffic stop was deemed to be invalid, and the drunk driving case dismissed, is People v. Pagano, 507 Mich. 26, 967 N.W.2d 590 (2021). In this intoxicated driving case the Michigan Supreme Court specifically found that the traffic stop based only on the 911 was insufficient to establish a reasonable suspicion that the driver was drunk. Because the stop was therefore legally invalid, the Court had no other choice but to dismiss the case outright.

In Pagano, the 911 caller reported that they had observed a woman driving while yelling at her kids and generally behaving in an obnoxious manner. While the caller indicated that they believed the driver was intoxicated, no other information was provided in support of this contention. However, the caller did provide much identifying information relative to the car being driven, including the license plate number, the make model and color of the car, and the direction the vehicle was traveling.

Drivers with Marijuana in their System are Less Likely to Cause Accidents than Drivers with a .05 BAC

Published on: January 1, 2022 | by Ryan Ramsayer

A new comprehensive study on the effects of marijuana use and driving has demonstrated that the use of marijuana has far less impact on driving than does the use of alcohol. Despite the fact that the emerging science suggests that drivers can use marijuana and operate their vehicles safely, the DUI laws in Michigan treat marijuana as being equal to or even more dangerous than alcohol.

Part of the reason for this disparity is that the public policy behind Michigan’s DUI laws are mired in many of the archaic misapprehensions that historically existed about marijuana and its impact on driving. Now that recreational marijuana is legal in Michigan for those above 21 years of age, a rational discussion of what, if any, effect marijuana has on driving is long overdue. To address this issue, Michael A. White and Nicholas R. Burns, preformed a meta-analysis on over 17 available marijuana studies to clarify the actual relationship between marijuana, specifically active THC, and driving.

Their study: The risk of being culpable for or involved in a road crash after using cannabis: A systematic review and meta-analyses, published in Drug Science, Policy and Law, concluded that it is likely that marijuana does not actually cause more accidents than the normal rate of accidents occurring by all drivers. To get to this determination, they used a process called meta-analysis, which is the review of previously published studies to obtain a more comprehensive result than any single study is capable of. For this analysis, they used 17 studies conducted between 1982 and 2020. These studies were conducted in several countries by different researchers with differing results. White and Burns then their own testing methodology in an effort to control for inherent biases in the prior studies.

Infrastructure Bill Breathalyzer Won’t Be What You Think

Published on: January 1, 2022 | by Patrick Barone

President Joe Biden’s Investment and Infrastructure and Jobs Act (IIJA) does require automakers to install advanced impairment detection technology, and sets a timeline for doing so. It is up to the transportation department to decide what technology to use.

As part of vehicle safety measures designed to determine if the driver may be impaired, breathalyzers are one option. But what the government really wants is something that will passively monitor the performance of the driver to identify whether that driver my be intoxicated. The highway traffic safety administration is also in favor of such technology.

In order for the technology to do it’s job it must be “advanced” and “passive.” It will be seamlessly placed into cars allowing the vehicle to accurately identify and measure driver impairment through driver performance. This anti drunk driving technology will also measure driver intoxication by analyzing the driver’s blood alcohol level. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Organization, the monitoring systems being considered do not include ignition interlock devices.

Advanced Impaired Driving Technology Could Begin Stopping Drunk Drivers in Two Years

Published on: January 1, 2022 | by Barone Defense Firm

On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed into law the bipartisan Investment Infrastructure and Jobs Act (IIJA). This new law contains a provision requiring that all passenger vehicles eventually be equipped with technology that will stop drunk drivers. New cars may start utilizing such technology immediately, but the law won’t require this advanced impaired driving technology any sooner than 2 years from now, though it’s likely to take far longer.

What is the Timeline for Requiring Advanced Impairment Detection Technology?

As previously indicated in our previous article entitled Infrastructure Bill to Combat Drunk Driving by Requiring Alcohol Monitoring Technology the new law does not, with any degree of specificity, indicate what technologies are to be utilized for this purpose. Instead, the law sets forth a timeline for the Secretary of Transportation to write the specific motor vehicle safety standard. Section 24220(c) indicates that not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of the IIJA, the Secretary of Transportation (SOT) shall issue a “final rule” requiring that a motor vehicle safety standard be added to the relevant section of the federal code.