Articles Posted in Felony Offenses

Published on: | by

If you are a physician, nurse, advanced practice provider, dentist, or other licensed healthcare professional in Michigan, an OWI charge may threaten your license, your job, and your reputation. But Operating While Intoxicated with a minor passenger, often called OWI child endangerment, is uniquely dangerous for many licensed health care professionals is because it can be treated as “endangering others,” in this case children, and that framing can trigger Medicare and Medicaid consequences that do not typically attach to other misdemeanor OWI offenses.

The consequence framework that governs licensed healthcare professionals across all categories of criminal charge, and why the decisions made at the charging and plea stages often determine whether federal program exclusion is triggered, is addressed in the firm’s analysis of criminal charges and licensed healthcare professionals in Michigan.

The criminal case is only the beginning. A single misdemeanor conviction under Michigan’s OWI with a minor passenger enhancement can create a domino effect involving Medicaid termination for a minimum period of five (5) years, Medicare enrollment revocation, licensure emergency action, controlled substance and DEA consequences, national reporting, and exclusion from federally funded healthcare work.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Michigan criminal sexual conduct defense attorney Patrick Barone of the Barone Defense Firm explains the degrees of CSC under Michigan law and what prosecutors must prove for each charge.Criminal sexual conduct in Michigan is divided into four degrees under MCL 750.520a, ranging from unwanted sexual contact punishable by two years in prison to sexual penetration with aggravating factors carrying a potential sentence of life without parole. Every degree of CSC conviction triggers a permanent felony record and potential registration under Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act.

Michigan’s CSC statutes do not require physical force, violence, or even awareness that conduct was criminal. The degree of a charge turns significantly on the ages of the parties and the nature of the contact. A person who engages in sexual touching with someone they believe to be of legal age may face a fourth-degree CSC charge if the alleged victim is between 13 and 15 years old, regardless of consent and regardless of any mistaken belief about age. Michigan law does not recognize a good-faith mistake about a victim’s age as a defense in most CSC cases.

The age thresholds that determine degree are specific and consequential. Sexual penetration with a victim under 13 is first-degree CSC regardless of any other circumstance. Sexual contact — meaning touching, not penetration — with a victim under 13 is second-degree CSC. Sexual penetration with a victim between 13 and 15 is third-degree CSC. Sexual contact with a victim between 13 and 15, or with a victim between 16 and 17 in certain relationships of authority, can constitute fourth-degree CSC. The difference between a life sentence and a two-year maximum can turn entirely on the victim’s age and the nature of the physical contact.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Deleted CSAM evidence in Michigan is rarely gone for good. Forensic analysts recover files through hash values stored in a device’s cache, even when images have been deleted by the user. A hash match against the NCMEC database can support charges without recovering the complete image file.

Deleted CSAM files are rarely eliminated from a device’s storage simply by hitting delete. One place deleted images frequently remain is in the device’s cache or temporary memory, where forensic analysts can identify and recover them even when the user believes the material is gone.

When a forensic analyst identifies a CSAM file on a device, what they have established is that a file matching a known hash value was present. A hash value is a unique numerical fingerprint assigned to a specific digital file. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children maintains a database of hash values for known CSAM images, and a match against that database can support charges even when the original image has been deleted, was never fully opened, or exists only as a fragment in the device’s cache memory.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

To avoid jail on a CSAM charge in Michigan requires early legal intervention, a proactive mitigation strategy, and experienced counsel. Courts have imposed probation rather than prison in appropriate cases. The charge level, county, judge, and pre-sentencing preparation all affect the outcome significantly.

Avoiding jail on a CSAM charge in Michigan is not simply a matter of assembling positive factors and presenting them to the judge. The sentencing proceeding will almost always include material from the prosecution about harm to children, and Michigan courts take the nature of these offenses seriously. A judge who has considered that material is not a neutral audience for a standard mitigation presentation. A defense narrative that does not honestly acknowledge that children are harmed by the existence of CSAM, including children harmed by those who consumed rather than produced it, will not be credible, regardless of how strong the individual mitigation factors look on paper.

The deeper challenge in building an effective mitigation narrative is often not legal but psychological. Many clients in CSAM cases carry significant shame and have developed defense mechanisms, minimization, rationalization, emotional detachment, that prevent them from accessing the authentic personal material a judge needs to see. A sentencing memorandum written from surface-level facts, without that deeper material, reads as clinical rather than human. Reaching what actually makes a narrative compelling often requires specialized preparation techniques designed to help clients move past these defenses in a safe and structured way.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

If you are charged with a felony in one of Michigan’s State courts, then you have a right to a preliminary examination. This hearing will take place after your probable cause conference. This probable cause conference must take place within 14 days of the arraignment.

A preliminary examination hearing is a hearing that takes place in the district court. The judge presiding over the hearing decides whether there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to the circuit court.

The main purpose of this hearing is to determine if the prosecutor can establish that there is a reasonable belief the defendant committed the crime in question.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Michigan and Federal criminal and Constitutional law provides that when a person is arrested and charged with a crime, they have the opportunity to seek release from custody by posting bail or bond. Your bond and any conditions of your pretrial release will be considered when you are first brought to court for your arraignment.

By posting bail, you provide a monetary guarantee that you will attend all future court hearings. If you fail to appear, you risk forfeiting the bail amount.

While granting temporary release, the court must also consider public safety. The court does this by imposing conditions on your pretrial release. The conditions of bond aim to minimize potential risks to the community while you are at large rather than in jail.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

discovery-in-criminal-case-scaled-e1683132062342-300x129In the United States, the discovery process in the criminal justice system is governed by federal and state laws and rules of criminal procedure. For example, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 sets out the requirements for discovery in federal criminal cases. State criminal procedure rules may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

In general, the prosecution in a felony case is required to disclose to the defense any evidence or information that is material to the case. This includes witness statements, police reports, crime scene images, forensic reports, expert witness reports, and other documents. This is known as “disclosure” or “discovery” by the prosecution. The prosecutor must also disclose exculpatory evidence.

The criminal defense attorney is also required to disclose to the prosecution any evidence or information that they plan to use at trial. This also includes witness lists, expert reports, and other documents. This is known as “reciprocal discovery” or “reciprocal disclosure” by the defense. However, attorney work product is protected and not subject to disclosure.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

If you have reason to believe that you are under investigation for a crime in Michigan, it is in your best interest to seek the advice and representation of an experienced criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible.

You may feel tempted to handle the matter on your own or wait until you have been formally charged with a crime. It is important to understand that the actions you take at this early stage can have a significant impact on the outcome of your criminal case.

If you are being investigated this only means that police officers are using many investigative tools against you as they are building a case. While you may not be facing criminal charges right now, you may well soon be notified that warrant for your arrest has been issued. You are better off hiring a criminal defense attorney now to protect your rights.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Jury nullification in Michigan can and does happen, which is when a jury judges the law instead of determining if a defendant is guilty of breraking that law.
Jury nullification occurs when a Michigan jury returns a verdict that is contrary to the law given them by the Judge. In a criminal case, jury nullification occurs when the jury, while believing the accused to be guilty, nevertheless return a verdict of not guilty.

In Michigan criminal defense cases, jury nullification can be both a fascinating and controversial topic. Many people are surprised to learn that a jury can essentially reject the law as it’s written if they feel applying it would result in an unjust outcome. This doesn’t happen often, but when it does, it can be a powerful reminder that our justice system includes a human element. Jurors are instructed to follow the law, but they also bring their own values and perspectives into the courtroom. For people facing serious charges like OWI or other criminal offenses in Michigan, understanding how a jury might respond to the facts—and the law—is an important part of legal strategy.

Usually this happens when the jurors either don’t like the MI criminal law in question or don’t believe that the criminal law is being appropriately applied. When a jury does this they are thought to “judge” the law.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

The news stories covering the extremely tragic school shooting in Oxford, Michigan has brought the issues of gun safety and gun storage to the forefront in the Great Lakes State once again. As the unfortunate story goes, it is alleged that 15-year-old Ethan Crumbley opened fire on his fellow students at Oxford High School on November 30th, 2021.

It is alleged that he killed four students and injured seven others including a teacher. Crumbley is facing four counts of first-degree murder, one count of terrorism causing death, seven counts of assault with intent to commit murder, and 12 counts of possessing a firearm while committing a felony.

The Parents of the Oxford Shooter Are Also Being Charged With Crimes

Continue Reading ›